#SPECTRALAYERS PRO 7 TUTORIALS FOR FREE#
#SPECTRALAYERS PRO 7 TUTORIALS TRIAL#
#SPECTRALAYERS PRO 7 TUTORIALS FREE#

I wonder if this translate in terms of CPU, did you guys optimized things with this in mind as well? If not and if it’s technically doable, I think this wouldīe an amazing selling point and user benefit, to build things in a way that using all steinberg ‘stock’ product make things faster and require less CPU than using third party plugin. And yes, everybody mentioned this already, but more demo video and tutorial is definitely needed, especially for a tool that is so different than other audio plugins (not everybody knows the photoshop way).ĬPU: I am a Cubase and Wavelab user, no doubt that in terms of workflow, it make sense to go all in using 3 well integrated steinberg software. I assume it didn’t help going through various owners and I hope / trust that Steinberg will be the right one to help the tool to grow and win more clients. I really like the story behind the tool, read some interviews where its creator told the story behind.

Also, I want to salute his creator Robin, that I know will read this as I see he is crazy active on this forum, very respectable thing to do, to be client facing and helping users using the product you designed and developer. I understand that many people consider it as a capable audio repair (usually less efficient than RX), and as a great sound design / creativity tool.

#SPECTRALAYERS PRO 7 TUTORIALS TRIAL#

I am looking more and more at SpectraLayers, just downloaded the 30 day trial yesterday to play around with it. Izotope also raised a lot of money, it’s really a (probably) great american start-up willing to eat the world, but the more money you raise, the more aggressive you need to be, product / pricing / growth… many people will not care about the company profile when choosing to buy a software, but I do. I also think it’s known that Izotope plugins are very CPU greedy, I myself just experienced it by putting roughly around 8 or maybe 10 (De-noise, De-Mouth, De-click, De-plosive…) instances on various track of my podcast, including a De-reverb as my guest was recorded through a Zoom call (which I think is the worse plugin in terms of CPU I think), and it was hell… I had to increase dramatically my buffer size to be able to playback anything. I read plenty of forums comments and I get that RX is easy, very well known and marketed, you trust a AI based back box, all tailored for very specific audio repair tasks. I’m currently in the middle of this very topic, RX or SpectraLayers? and use them, and when it can be done, abuse them…) although i have always in the back of my head, all the rules. Spectralayers pro that is more my thing, or completely my thing… (completely, there are always wishes, but pro 7 has given me more control, in another thread i already said, i am not a cleaner. not that it is bad tool, on the contrary i think.

don’t have advanced, nor will i ever own it. it seems to have more AI possibilities, i don’t know if the results are better.

#SPECTRALAYERS PRO 7 TUTORIALS FREE#

(and have also the free version, because of a plugin i wanted…).

Rx elements, this is the first time it is for free, 7.

#SPECTRALAYERS PRO 7 TUTORIALS FOR FREE#

There are some great upgrade/crossgrade offers on izotope stuff at the moment…check out plugin boutique…you can even get RX elements for free I’m using RX7 advanced which I believe has extra cleanup features than elements. I have both - RX7 is much more capable at audio repair … the results are better and on the whole the workflow is faster.

Spectralayers pro 7 tutorials